Prevalence of chronic pain in adults in Costa Rica, Jan-2020 to March-2021
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
AUDIO (Español (España))

Keywords

Chronic pain
epidemiology
prevalence
Latin America

How to Cite

1.
Acuña-Aguilar C, Fernández-Cordero A, Benavides-Lara A. Prevalence of chronic pain in adults in Costa Rica, Jan-2020 to March-2021. Rev Ter [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 27 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];16(1):50-66. Available from: https://revistaterapeutica.net/index.php/RT/article/view/140

Abstract

Introduction:  The aim of the study was to determine the epidemiological behavior and care of adults with chronicle pain. Methodology: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted through a telephone survey (home telephone), to people over 19 years , resident in Costa Rica for at least three months, estimated a random sample with national representativeness, weighted according to the 82 cantons of the country. The prevalence of chronic pain was determined with its respective CI 95% for the country and each province. Results:  interviews were conducted to 375 people in an age range of 57.4 years (SD 17.4), 73.1% women. One hundred and eight people reported chronic pain for a national prevalence of 28.8% (95% CI 24.3-33.7), with a mean age significantly higher than the interviewed population (62.9 years; SD 14.2). None difference were found by province. The mean duration of pain was 61 months (SD: 104.7; range 36-756 months). Osteoarthritis, as a single cause, occurred in 65.6% of cases. The lower limb was the most frequent location (53.70%). For the intensity of pain (numerical scale from 0 to 10): 69.4% scored equal to or greater than 5, 29.6% was placed on the scale between 8 to 10. According to their frequency, 54% had pain on a daily basis; most described it as numbness (40.74%). Eighty-three percent used pharmacological measures, mainly no steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs were used by a 76.9%; 64% of these was prescribed by a professional in medicine, 30% self-medicated or follow advertising advice or friend recommendation. The working area was the most affected sphere of daily life (70.37%), followed by sleep disorders (59.3%). Conclusion: chronicle pain in adults in Costa Rica is a public health problem, with prevalence similar to the one reported in Latin America, that increases significantly with age. Most people, who suffer from it, are affected daily for prolonged period. It highlights the low use of opioid, a high consumption of NSAIDS and self-medication.

https://doi.org/10.33967/rt.v15i2.140
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
AUDIO (Español (España))

References

International Association for the Study of Pain. Classification of Chronic Pain [Internet]. 2a ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. Part III: Pain Terms, A Current List with Definitions and Notes on Usage; 209-214. Disponible en: https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-iasp/files/production/public/Content/ContentFolders/Publications2/ClassificationofChronicPain/Part_III-PainTerms.pdf

López Sánchez JR, Rivera Largacha S. Historia del concepto de dolor total y reflexiones sobre la humanización de la atención a pacientes terminales. Rev Cienc Salud. 2018;16(2):340-356. doi: 10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6773

Bilberny N. Dolor crónico en Chile. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2019;30(6):397-406. doi: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2019.08.002

Dorner TE. Pain and chronic pain epidemiology: Implications for clinical and public health fielDE. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018;130(1-2):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1301-0.

van Hecke O, Torrance N, Smith BH. Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(1):13-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet123.

Wolkerstorfer A, Handler N, Buschmann H. New approaches to treating pain. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26(4):1103-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.12.103

Covarrubias Gómez A, Guevara López U, Gutiérrez Salmerón C, Betancourt Sandoval JA, Córdova Domínguez JA. Epidemiología del dolor crónico en México. Rev Mex Anestesiol [Internet]. 2010;33(4):207-213. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/rma/cma-2010/cma104e.pdf

Harstall C, Ospina M. How prevalent is chronic pain?. Pain Clin Updates [Internet]. 2003; 11(2): 1-4. Disponible en: https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-iasp/files/production/public/Content/ContentFolders/Publications2/PainClinicalUpdates/Archives/PCU03-2_1390265045864_38.pdf

Goldberg DE, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:770. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-770.

Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009.

Federación Latinoamericana de Asociaciones para el Estudio del Dolor [Internet]. San José: FEDELAT; 2018. Herramientas de Evaluación del Dolor; [aprox. 4 pantallas]. Disponible en: https://fedelat.com/herramientas-de-evaluacion-del-dolor-2-2/

Guerrero Liñeiro AM, Gómez López MP. Prevalencia de dolor crónico en Colombia. VIII Estudio Nacional de Dolor [Internet]. Bogotá: ACED; 2014. Disponible en: https://www.consultorsalud.com/wp-content/uploaDE/2014/11/viii_estudio_prevalencia_dolor_cronico_en_colombia_publicacion_pagina_aced_2014.pdf

de Moraes Vieira EB, Garcia JB, da Silva AA, Mualem Araújo RL, Jansen RC. Prevalence, characteristics, and factors associated with chronic pain with and without neuropathic characteristics in São Luís, Brazil. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44(2):239-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.08.014.

Miranda JP, Morales A, Cavada G, Eberhard ME, Ahumada M, Méndez L, et al. Validación primera encuesta chilena de Dolor Crónico no oncológico. Rev El Dolor [Internet] 2013;22(60):10-18. Disponible en: https://www.ached.cl/upfiles/revistas/documentos/54983802911a6_original1.pdf

Dueñas M, Salazar A, Ojeda B, Fernández-Palacín F, Micó JA, Torres LM, et al. A nationwide study of chronic pain prevalence in the general spanish population: identifying clinical subgroups through cluster analysis. Pain Med. 2015;16(4):811-22. doi: 10.1111/pme.12640.

Cline DM. Dolor crónico. En: Tintinalli J, editora. Tintinalli. Medicina de urgencias. 8a ed. México: McGraw-Hill; 2018, Capítulo 38.

Díaz R, Marulanda F, Sáenz X. Estudio epidemiológico del dolor crónico en Caldas, Colombia (Estudio DOLCA). Acta Med Colomb. [internet] 2009;34(3):96-102. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/amc/v34n3/v34n3a2.pdf

Vindas Miranda TM. Respuesta del tratamiento farmacológico para el dolor crónico de tipo no oncológico en los pacientes atendidos en la clínica del dolor del Hospital Nacional Geriátrico Raúl Blanco Cervantes, durante el periodo de enero del 2014 a enero del 2015 [Tesis de Posgrado de Geriatría y Gerontología]. San José, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica; 2018. Disponible en: http://repositorio.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/13337/1/40034.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (CR) [Internet]. San José: INEC; 2011. INEC publica indicadores provinciales; [aprox. 4 pantallas]. Disponible en: https://www.inec.cr/noticia/inec-publica-indicadores-provinciales

Friessem CH, Willweber-Strumpf A, Zenz MW. Chronic pain in primary care. German figures from 1991 and 2006. BMC Public Health. 2009 18;9:299. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-299.

De Andrés J, Acuña JP, Olivares A. Dolor en el paciente de la tercera edad. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2014;25(4):674-686. doi: 10.1016/S0716-8640(14)70089-6

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Carlos Acuña-Aguilar, Ariel Fernández-Cordero, Adriana Benavides-Lara

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.