Abstract
Introduction: Determine the support needs of families who has a member with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) in early ages, in terms of quality of life, is essential for early intervention programs. Costa Rica does not have research around the theme, nor adapted scales for evaluation of family needs. Consequently, the objective of this study is to validate the Scale for the Evaluation of Family Needs (EFNS), for the Costa Rican population.
Methodology: Observational, quantitative study of psychometric type, which was carried out in a sample of families of people with IDD under 18 years of age, using as a population framework the Register of the Special Education Centers of Costa Rica, providing by the Ministry of Public Education. Three stages were carried out: first the Expert Judgment to review the items, using Cohen's Kappa indicator in order to determine the level of concordance; second, a pilot test with 12 families was carried out. As a result of both phases, the first version of the ENF-CR was obtained, with a total of 68 items culturally validated. In the third phase, the ENF-CR, as well as the Costa Rican Family Quality of Life Scale (FQoL-CR), was applied to the selected sample.
Results: The results show that the psychometric properties of the EFNS-CR are good. The exploratory factor analysis corroborated the construct validity that is specified in a solution of 61 items distributed in seven factors. Likewise, the estimation of the reliability coefficient shows an excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 97.78%. While, regarding the validity of the criterion, the evidence showed that there is no significant linear correlation between the mean scores of the FQoL-CR and the EFNS-CR scales.
Conclusion: the EFNS-CR, has contrasted psychometric properties to be considered a tool with very good reliability and validity, to be used in the Costa Rican context.
Keywords: Family needs assessment; Intellectual disability; Family quality of life, validation, Costa Rica.
References
2. Summers J, Poston D, Turnbull A, Marquis J, Hoffman L, Mannan H et al. Conceptualizing and measuring family quality of life. J Intellect Disabil Res [Internet]. 2005; 49(10):777-783. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005. 00751.x
3. Brown I, Brown R, Baum N, Isaacs B, Myerscough T, Neikrug S et al. Family quality of life survey: main caregivers of people with intellectual or developmental disabilities. Toronto: Surrey Place Centre; 2006.
4. Giné C, Vilaseca R, Gárcia M, Simón C, Dalmau M, Salvador F et al. Las escalas de valoración de calidad de vida familiar (cdvf-e). Apoyo y orientación para la intervención. Siglo Cero [Internet]. 2013;44(3):21-36. Disponible en: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/59005/1/641224.pdf
5. Zuna N, Summers J, Turnbull A, Hu X, Xu S. Theorizing about family quality of life. Enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities: From theory to practice. En: Kober R, editor. Enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. 241-278.
6. Gallimore R, Bernheimer L, Weisner T. Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities. En: Gallimore R, Bernheimer L, MacMillan D, Speece D, Vaughn S, editors. Family life is more than managing crisis: Broadening the agenda of research on families adapting to childhood disability. New York: Routledge; 1999. 55-80.
7. Guralnick MJ. A developmental systems model for early intervention. Infants Young Child [Internet]. 2001;14(2):1-18. doi:10.1097/00001163
8. Guralnick MJ. Early intervention for children with intellectual disabilities: Current knowledge and future prospects. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil [Internet]. 2005;18:313-324. Disponible en: https://depts.washington.edu/chdd/guralnick/pdfs/ei_jar_18_05.pdf
9. Guralnick MJ. Why early intervention works: a systems perspective. Infants Young Child [Internet]. 2011;24(1):6-28. doi:10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182002cfe
10. Más J, Giné C. La familia con un hijo con dificultades o trastornos en el desarrollo. En: Cristóbal C, Fornós A, Giné C, Más J, Pegenaute F, coord. La atención temprana, un compromiso con la infancia y sus familias. Barcelona: UOC; 2010. 59-80.
11. Turnbull A, Brown I, Turnbull R. Families and persons with mental retardation and quality of life: International perspectives. Washington: American Association on Mental Retardation; 2004.
12. Epley P, Summers J, Turnbull A. Characteristics and trends in family centered conceptualizations. J Fam Soc Work [Internet]. 2010;13(3):269–285. doi: 10.1080/10522150903514017
13. Dunst C, Trivette C, Deal A. Enabling and empowering Families. Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge: Brooklyn Books; 1989.
14. Thompson J, Bradley V, Buntinx W, Schalock K, Shogren K, Snell M et al. Conceptualizando los apoyos y las necesidades de apoyo de personas con discapacidad intelectual. Siglo Cero [Internet]. 2010;41(1):7-22. Disponible en: http://sid.usal.es/idocs/F8/ART14280/233-1%20Thompson.pdf
15. Schalock R, Borthwick-Duffy S, Bradley V, Buntinx W, Coulter D, Craig E et al. Intellectual disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. 11a ed. Washington: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities; 2010.
16. Verdugo Alonso M, Shalock R. Últimos avances en el enfoque y concepción de las personas con discapacidad intelectual. Siglo Cero [Internet]. 2010;41(4):7-21. Disponible en: http://www.plenainclusion.org/sites/default/files/sc_236.pdf
17. Brown J, Moraes S, Mayhew J. Service needs of foster families with children who have disabilities. J Child Fam Stud [Internet]. 2005;14(3):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s10826-005-6853-3
18. Kendall J, Leo M, Perrin N, Hatton D. Service needs of families with children with ADHD. J Fam Nurs [Internet]. 2005;11(3):264-288. doi: 10.1177/1074840705278629
19. Taggrat L, Truesdale-Kennedy M, Ryan A. McConkey R. Examining the support needs of family carers in developing future plans for a relative with an intellectual disability. Int J Dev Disabil [Internet]. 2012;16(3):217-234. Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.823.9670&rep=rep1&type=pdf
20. Hu X, Turnbull A, Summers J, Wang M. Needs of Chinese families with children with developemental disabilities: A Qualitative Inquiry. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil [Internet]. 2015;12(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12110
21. Wong S, Wong T, Martinson L, Lai A, Chen W, He Y. Needs of Chinese parents of children with develmomental disability. J Learn Disabil [Internet]. 2004;8(2):141-158. doi: 10.1177/1469004704042703
22. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Informe Mundial sobre Discapacidad [Internet]. Ginebra: OMS; 2011. Disponible en: goo.gl/UGihL3
23. Bailey D, Simeonsson R. Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants. J Spec Educ [Internet]. 1988;22(1):117-127. Disponible en: http://www.downov-sindrom.si/prenosi/Zgodnja%20obravnava/Bailey88.pdf
24. Skilos S, Kerns K. Assesing need for social support in parents of children with autism and Down Syndrome. Rev J Autism Dev Disord [Internet]. 2006;36(7):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0129-7
25. Leung C, Lau J, Chang G, Lau B, Chui, M. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the service needs of families with children with developmental disabilities. Int Rev Res Dev Disabil [Internet]. 2010;31(3): 664-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.01.005
26. Baqués Aguiar N. La valoración de las necesidades de apoyo de las familias con un hijo/a con discapacidad intelectual. Validación de una escala. [Tesis de Doctorado en Psicología]. Barcelona: Universidad Ramón Llull; 2017.
27. Chiu C, Turnbull A y Summers J. What families need: validation or the family needs assessment for Taiwanese families of children with intellectual disability and developmental delay. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl [Internet]. 2013;38(4):247-258. Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.914.3368&rep=rep1&type=pdf
28. Aya Gómez V, Ovalle Parra A, Cabrera García V, Muñoz Gómez D y Duque Romero C. Validation of the family needs assessment scales for Colombian families with intellectual disability. Int J Disabil Hum Dev [Internet]. 2017;16(3):311-319. DOI:10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0033
29. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (CR). X Censo Nacional de Población y VI Censo Nacional de Vivienda 2011. San José, CR: INEC; 2011.
30. Segunda Vicepresidencia de la República de Costa Rica, Consejo Nacional de Rehabilitación y Educación Especial, Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia. Una aproximación a la niñez y la adolescencia con discapacidad en Costa Rica [Internet]. San José, CR: UNICEF; 2014. Disponible en: https://www.unicef.org/20140801_discapacidad_cr.pdf
31. Muñiz J, Elosua P y Hambleton R. Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema [Internet]. 2013;25(2):151-157. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.24
32. Cho S, Kyoung S. Predictors of life satisfaction among Caregivers of children with developmental disabilities in South Korea. Asian Soc Sci [Internet]. 2015;11(2):154–166. doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n2p154
Política de acceso, distribución y derechos de uso.
La revista se publica en línea como medio principal y en versión impresa solamente para archivo en Biblioteca de la Universidad Santa Paula.
La publicación en la revista no tiene costo para los autores.
Sesión de derechos: Al optar por la publicación en la RT, el autor conserva los derechos de uso y reuso de su obra, siempre y cuando cite la revista como primera fuente de publicación
Los artículos de la revista son de acceso abierto y se distribuyen de acuerdo con los términos de la licencia de Creative Commons Attribution- NoDerivates 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0), que permite el uso, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio, siempre que el trabajo original se cite correctamente. No se permiten modificaciones, más si el uso comercial de los artículos. En cualquier reproducción de los artículos no debe haber ninguna sugerencia de que la Rev Ter, la Universidad Santa Paula o los autores del artículo respalden ninguna organización o producto específico. No se permite el uso del logotipo de la Rev Ter o la Universidad Santa Paula.
El acceso a los manuscritos de texto completo es gratuito para los lectores. La revista no acepta anuncios de patrocinadores.
La Revista Terapéutica se encuentra indexada Redib y está en proceso de indexación en Latindex , el cual concluirá en 2019.